(Closed) Request For Proposal – GPSNR-RFP-A02-027-GPSNR Annual Report

Deadline for submission has been updated to 8th July 2022

Note: awarding of the contract will be subject to securing of full funding

1. Introduction

The Global Platform for Sustainable Naural Rubber is an international, multi-stakeholder, voluntary membership initiative committed to improving the socioeconomics and environmental performance of the natural rubber value chain.  Development of the GPSNR was intiated by the CEOs of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Tire Industry Project (TIP) in 2018.  Members of the platform include tire manufacturers, rubber suppliers and processors, vehicle makers and NGOs.  Representatives from each of these stakeholder groups have contributed to the development of the Singapore-based platform and the wide-reaching set of priorities that will define strategy and objectives.

The GPSNR aims to support the natural rubber sector to become more sustainable. Key element in achieving  this is to ensure there is capacity among smallholders and industrial plantations to adopt best practices in NR  production.

GPSNR, through the GPSNR Capacity Building Working Group (Indonesia National Subgroup), is seeking to engage service providers to implement the following aspects of disease fighting for natural rubber trees in Indonesia:

1. On-site inspection for diseases across multiple regions
2. Pilot rapid response mechanism for disease fighting
3. Develop and distribute materials on disease fighting
4. Coaching smallholders on disease treatment and prevention

Proposed programmes should be implemented in line with GPSNR environmental and social commitments and values, based on the GPSNR Policy Framework¹.

¹https://sustainablenaturalrubber.org/policy-framework/

2. Objectives and Scope of Work     

There are approximately 2.25M smallholders in Indonesia, representing 83% of national natural rubber production (3.6 M tonnes). Smallholders cultivate less than 2 ha of land with an average yield of slightly below 1 ton/ha, as compared to state and private commercial plantations achieving 1.4 ton/ha and 1.5 ton/ha respectively. 

Diseases are a major threat to rubber trees, with 80 – 90% of farmers experiencing tree diseases in 2019 in West Kalimantan and South Sumatra, and 60% in Jambi. When disease (pink and white root rot) attacks trees, the trees should be cut down, leaving not even the stem in the ground, to minimise infection of other trees. A new rubber leaf fall disease is spreading in Sumatra and Kalimantan. This disease causes leaf fall more than twice a year and reduces annual yield by up to 40%. The treatment for this disease is expensive and is often not implemented by smallholders.

Five provinces contribute 66.5% of national production: South Sumatra, North Sumatra, Jambi, Riau, and West Kalimantan. South Sumatra province is Indonesia’s largest and most productive area. Its natural rubber area is almost 23% of the total national productive area and smallholders’ plantations take up 98.5% of this area. The productivity of smallholders in South Sumatra is the highest among smallholder areas in Indonesia, producing 1.3 ton/ha, and more likely to have received GAP training. In 2019 the government announced a replanting plan for 2019 – 2027, with a focus on South Sumatra (92,600 ha), South Kalimantan (76,550 ha) and Jambi (69,900 ha). However, this plan has no large-scale lending programme associated with it and is to be executed by local governments and has not yet been implemented. Demand for replanting is strongest in Jambi, where 40% of farmers are willing to undertake replanting. Demand is lowest in West Kalimantan, where only 1 farmer out of 79 was contemplating. Most likely the demand in Jambi is due to peak planting being undertaken in 1995 – 2005 and the majority of the trees are approaching their maximum productive age, and Jambi farmers are more aware of the importance of good quality clones and their impact on yield – they also have the highest rate of nursery clone purchase – and have suffered less from disease. 

The GPSNR Policy Framework provides a framework for GPSNR member companies to align their natural rubber purchasing policies on all aspects of sustainability: economic, environmental, and social. Modelled around the Platform’s 12 Principles of Sustainable Natural Rubber, the GPSNR policy framework sets out eight overarching themes that include commitments to legal compliance, community livelihoods, healthy, functioning ecosystems (including no deforestation), and respecting all human rights.

In line with the GPSNR Policy Framework, the GPSNR Secretariat has prepared guidance on the Policy Evaluation Procedure to support members in aligning their corporate policies with the GPSNR Policy Framework.

GPSNR Smallholders Policy Equivalent for Smallholder Members

As of March 2022, GPSNR currently has 112 smallholder members across 10 countries: Brazil, Cambodia, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Ivory Coast, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Vietnam.

While this represents a small percentage of the millions of smallholder producers globally, GPSNR is committed to developing the mechanisms, tools, and processes to support smallholders globally in adopting best practices for natural rubber production in terms of economic, environmental and social outcomes. 

Source:
Financial Assessment of Smallholder Natural Rubber Production in Indonesia. July 2020. USAID Green Invest Asia, HeveaConnect, SNV and Financial Access.²

²https://www.facsglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Final-Rubber-report-2020.pdf

3. Expected Deliverables

GPSNR has outlined four project stages as part of the Comprehensive Disease Fighting Approach.

Note: All available and collated information through this project will compiled, analysed and integrated with existing literature, to further contribute to developing a full inventory of natural rubber disease in Indonesia and globally.

Stage 1: On-site inspection for diseases on a regional basis

Expected length of time:
3-4 months

Objective:
To carry out on-location inspections for presence of diseases in key rubber producing regions in Indonesia

The consultant should put forth recommendations

Key evaluation metrics:

• Inspections should be carried out by accredited technical experts on rubber diseases in Indonesia
• The proposal should clearly state intended regions for inspections and justify these selections. A minimum of four major natural rubber producing regions should be presented.

• Inspections should define and document the following (non-exhaustive) list of key parameters and findings:
  • Regions and locations (GPS-data; statistically randomised sample of locations)
  • Affected area sizes and hectares inspected, as well as a map of healthy locations
  • Map of rubber growing regions; randomly sampled process of disease mapping and areas inspected
  • Number of smallholders affected
  • Photos (high quality) and other visual evidence of diseases
  • In general, all diseases reported by the interviewed farmers should be properly documented (location, phenomena, season of occurrence, photos …). Specific attention should be given to the occurrence/symptoms of the following diseases (Type of diseases, e.g.,):
    • White root disease (e.g., rigidoporus microporus fungus)
    • Leaf disease (Pestalotiopsis)
    • Fusarium
    • Tapping panel dryness (TPD)
    • Colletotrichum
    • Animal / insect / pest issues
    • All other forms of diseases / issues to be documented
    • Screen for emergent threats or new disease developments
  • History of site (e.g., past crop activities)
  • Clone types inspected
  • Interactions, if any, between natural rubber and other crops such as palm oil
  • Other details to be included by the bidder

Expected outputs

Documentation and public sharing

The overall findings of Stage 1 are expected to be documented in a formal report or detailed presentation. This will be shared with GPSNR and made publicly available, and also shared actively within the natural rubber eco-system in Indonesia (and other countries).

• The inspection team could also be invited to share the results through a GPSNR members-only or public webinar
• The formal report or detailed presentation is expected to serve as a living document that will be continuously open for updates and further inputs beyond the timeline of this project

Further Stages of this project

The overall findings of Stage 1 will also shape the subsequent Stages of this project, with more details outlined below.

Stage 2: Pilot Rapid Response Mechanism for Disease Fighting

Expected length of time:
To begin development concurrently with Stage 1 (Inspection), and to be in operation within 3-4 months of project starting, until project end (November 2023)

Objective:
To conceptualise and implement a pilot mechanism for smallholders to reach out to disease experts for technical advice on diseases, and to allow rapid response by experts if a situation warrants

Key evaluation metrics:

• To establish pilot channels (such as call or digital “hotlines”) for smallholders to reach out to disease experts. This could be in any of the following (non-exhaustive) forms:
  • Telephone line
  • Whatsapp group
  • Facebook group
  • Any other possibilities
• Outline operational and maintenance needs for the communication channel such as the following (non-exhaustive):
  • Manpower costs
  • Digital or infrastructural costs
  • Others

• Mechanism of immediate follow-up on areas found to be vulnerable to diseases

• Propose a long-term and sustainable model of the “hotline” mechanism, including overview of the stated costs above
  • Actual operationalising for the longer-term will depend on the effectiveness of the mechanism during the project pilot period

Expected outputs

“Hotline” Mechanism

The “hotline” mechanism, in a form proposed by the bidder, should be in operation within 3-4 months of the project starting, and be evaluated under the following criteria:

• Uptake and usage by smallholders (to be documented on a regional basis)
• Operational and maintenance costs
• Effectiveness in addressing or responding to smallholder queries
• Effectiveness in identifying vulnerable regions

Stage 3: Develop and Distribute Materials on Disease Fighting

Expected length of time:
To begin development concurrently with Stage 1 (Inspection), and to be ready for distribution to smallholder communities within 3-4 months of project start

Objective:
To develop and distribute disease fighting materials to smallholder communities, including information relating to the Rapid Response “hotline” mechanism to be developed in Stage 2

Key evaluation metrics:

• Outline proposed content for the materials
• Outline proposed format of the materials (e.g., video, leaflets, brochures, poster infographics etc.)

• Outline intended manner of distribution to smallholders and their communities, including specific locations and local partners who could help with distribution (if any)

• Note: as technical experts on diseases and experts on smallholder interactions in Indonesia, the selected bidder is expected to be in-charge of the content and distribution of the materials
  • GPSNR may separately tender for a graphic designer to work with the bidder to format content into visually effective materials

Expected outputs

• Materials to be shared in physical or communal venues where smallholders convene on a regular basis

Stage 4: Disease Fighting Coaching

Expected length of time:
To begin after Stage 1 (Inspection) is completed, and to be planned based on the findings of Stage 1 (Inspection) and tailored toward ongoing inputs received through Stage 2 (Rapid Response “hotline”)

Objective:
To conduct on-site training for smallholders on disease treatment and prevention

Key evaluation metrics:

• Outline coaching plans for the following scenarios, based on the results of Stage 1 (Inspection) and Stage 2 (Rapid Response “hotline”)
  • Scenario A: coaching plan for high evidence of disease outbreak in one or more regions
  • Scenario B: coaching plan for low-to-no evidence of disease outbreak in one or more regions

• Outline intended number of train-the-trainer sessions depending on Scenarios A and B

• Outline plan for demonstration plots based on location-specific diseases, or case-studies

• Outline plan to provide, safeguard, and instruct smallholders on using approved materials, tools (e.g., approved agrichemicals; reference sources to procure such materials) for prevention and treatment purposes
• Outline number of smallholders to be coached within the given timeframe

Expected outputs

• Smallholder coaching sessions to be conducted based on the findings of Stage 1 (Inspection) and feedback received in Stage 2 (Rapid Response “hotline”)

Overall Metrics

Submitted proposals should provide justifications and details on the costs, timeline, and rationales for each of the Stages above, with a focus on the following rubber-producing regions:

1. Northern Sumatra
2. Southern Sumatra
3. Central Sumatra
4. West Kalimantan
5. East Kalimantan

The GPSNR Capacity Building Working Group (Indonesia National Subgroup) may prioritise funding for specific regions based on relative productivity, coverage of existing coaching services, socio-economic needs, or other considerations.

Service providers are also expected to operate in line with principles and values set forth in the GPSNR Policy Framework³ such as commitment to environmental protection and sustainability, zero deforestation, community engagement and FPIC etc.

The selected service providermay also be expected to work closely with the GPSNR Capacity Building Working Group (Indonesia National Subgroup) to fine-tuned or further augment the clone selection and delivery timelines.

³https://sustainablenaturalrubber.org/policy-framework/

4. Proposal Format and Contents

The proposal should include the following:

1. A workplan that outlines all key activities of the deliverables (as outlined in 3. Expected Deliverables above)
2. Timeline and key stages of operations (based on 5. Expected Timeline below)
3. Budget, including detailed breakdown of expected manpower, logistics, and costs (based on 6. Budget below)
4. Description of past work and proof of technical expertise on natural rubber disease is highly critical for this RFP
   • Description of disease identification and methodologies
5. A list of project team members with their roles in the project and associated qualifications

5. Expected Timelines

The work shall begin by July 2022 and the various phases shall be completed in accordance with the approximate timeline below:

Consultants should detail a project timeline with milestones that are approximately in line with the above timeline.

Consultants will also provide fortnightly or monthly progress updates to the GPSNR Capacity Working Group, or on an as-needed basis.

6. Budget

The Platform is anticipating that the total budget of no more than 220,000 EUR be allocated to the Four Stages of the project. The approximate expected breakdown for each Stage is as such:

• Stage 1 and 2: 120,000 EUR

• Stage 3: 50,000 EUR (sum inclusive of graphic designing of visuals for smallholder communities)

• Stage 4: 50,000 EUR

Bidders should propose budget allocations for each Stage as they deem suitable.

Payment terms shall be proposed by the bidder and discussed with GPSNR, in line with each Stage of the project.

7. Evaluation Factors

GPSNR will rate proposals based on the following factors:

1. Responsiveness to the requirements set forth in this Request for Proposal
2. Relevant past performance/experience/accreditation of the bidder
3. Samples of work (e.g., previous training or coaching programmes in Indonesia)
4. Technical expertise/experience of bidder and bidder’s staff
5. Proposed timeline of operations

GPSNR reserves the right to award to the bidder that presents the best value to GPSNR as determined solely by GPSNR in its absolute discretion.

Introduction & Background

The Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR) is an international, multi-stakeholder, voluntary membership initiative seeking to lead improvements in the socioeconomic and environmental performance of the natural rubber value chain. Members of the platform include tire manufacturers, rubber suppliers and processors, vehicle makers and NGOs.

The Risk Subgroup of GPSNR is seeking a consultant/field team to identify, test, evaluate and report on what effort may be required for a rubber processor to map their supply shed (i.e., all the farms that they are sourcing from) in complex supply chains such as in Indonesia and Thailand. 

Objectives

The goal of the pilot is to investigate what effort (i.e., time, effort, cost, labour) may be required for a rubber processor to map their supply chain in complex supply chains such as Indonesia and Thailand.

The goal of this pilot is to map at least 300 small holder farmers supplying one processing mill each in Thailand. The subgroup is open to negotiation on the total number of small holder farms mapped based on the service provider’s experience and estimation.

The service provider should work with the GPSNR Risk Subgroup and the participating processors from Thailand and their dealers to:

1. Keep track of time and costs of all mapping related activities throughout the study, calculate time and cost of mapping each farm, and provide them to their GPSNR Point of Contact at the end of the survey.
2. Register and map farmers using field-based mapping or in combination with remote sensing that is crossed checked with field-based mapping samples. The service provider is welcomed to use their own method.
   1. Collect and provide the shapefiles from the mapping at the end of the project to the point of contact and the participating processor.
3. Ask farmers to answer the RubberWay questionnaire.
4. Ask farmers to answer the HCVRN Nature Positive Farming questionnaire.
5. Unless automatically uploaded, submit farmers’ responses to the respective databases and the GPSNR point of contact at the end of each day for compilation.
6. Record the effort required to convince 300 farmers per processing mill to complete all 3 tools.
   1. Number of dealers and farmers contacted to identify 300 farmers willing to participate in study.
   2. Total person hours required to identify 300 willing suppliers.
   3. Details of incidental (not staff time) expenses required to identify 300 willing farmers.
7. Record the effort required/difficulty to convince the super dealers/suppliers to participate in the study, based on the supplier tiers & on the pilot sample goal.
   1. Skip Tier 1 farms
   2. Not more than 100 responses from Tier 2
   3. 200 responses from Tier 3 and 4 suppliers

Scope of Work

• Field data collection has to be completed by the second month from the starting date of the project.
  • Ideally, field teams are experienced in 2 or more of the above tools (RubberWay questionnaire, HCVRN Nature Positive Farming questionnaire and field-based or remote sensing-based mapping), else training will be provided. Please indicate which tools your team is experienced in using we will provide the necessary training.
    • If remote-sensing based is preferred by the service provider, please respond with the process and note that the data has to be cross-checked with field-based samples.
  • Field teams have to be able to speak the local language at each survey location(i.e., Thai).
• GPSNR estimates the necessary activities per farm and the time required to conduct them to be as follows:

1. Explain purpose of visit (~15 mins)
2. Get permission for personal data collection to ensure data protection (~5mins)
3. Map farm via mapping based on the mapping method chosen by the service provider (e.g., field-based mapping or remote sensing cross-checked with field samples) (~90mins).
   1. Mapping for farms <4 hectares:
      1. Polygon mapping or GPS mapping is up to the discretion of the service provider.
   2. Polygon mapping for farms above 4 hectares:
      1. This is based on the EU regulation (see Annex A) that a polygon would be required for farmers over 4 hectares.
      2. At least 10% (~30 of the 300 farms must be polygon mapped)
   3. Fill in RubberWay questionnaire (~30mins)
   4. Fill in HCVRN Nature Positive Farming questionnaire (~30mins – 1 hour)
   5. Verify data before departure (~10mins)

• GPSNR assumes:
  • Total time required: ~approximately 180 mins/3 hours per farm per field assistant.
  • Farms likely to be covered per day: 2 farms.
  • Total number of field assistant days required assuming 2 farms per day: 450 days
  • Total weeks required for 1 field assistant assuming 5 work days per week: 90 weeks
  • Total weeks required for two processors assuming 10 field assistants working simultaneously in one country: 9 weeks
  • This is an estimation of the time taken, we look forward to a comparison with the final recorded timings.
• If you have other ideas on how to achieve the above objectives, please provide details about how you would design the study

Expected Deliverables

Specifically, GPSNR expects the consultant to:

 1. Map at least 300 farmers supplying to the participating processor in Thailand and provide the shapefiles to the processor and the GPSNR point of contact.

a.      There should at least be 10% (~30 farms out of 300 farms) that are polygon mapped, based on the requirements mentioned above and in Annex A.

 2. We would like a detailed account of the time and resources spent on 1. travelling to the farm, 2. On the farm and 3. Data analysis

a.      We would like to see a breakdown of the total time spent in each component. E.g., Total reported time spent on 1 farm + 1 analysis = 8hours, within that 2 hour (time taken to travel to farm), 0.5 hours (convincing the farmer), 0.5 hours (communicating to farmer about the tool), 20 mins (Mapping the farms), 30 mins (HCVN questionnaire), 30 mins (Rubberway questionnaire)

 3. An evaluation of the merits and limitations of each tool

a.      E.g., 3/11 farmers surveyed were more apprehensive about the mapping tool due to fear of exposing their location.

 4. A recommendation of the scalability of this pilot

a.      Can the same estimated cost/time/labour be replicated in other regions/jurisdictions within the same country?

b.     E.g., $X/farm is calculated but is not scalable due to what reason(s).

Proposal Format and Contents

The proposal should include the following:

1. A workplan that outlines the key activities towards the deliverables outlined in Expected Deliverables above

2. The timeline and key stages of operations based on Project Timeline below

3. Budget, including detailed breakdown of expected manpower, logistics, and costs based on Budget below

4. Description of past work and technical expertise that is relevant to this RFP

A list of project team members with their roles in the project and associated qualifications.

Submission Guidelines & Requirements

The following submission guidelines & requirements apply to this Request for Proposal:

1. Proposals will only be accepted from individuals or firms with experience relevant to this project.
2. Examples of previous relevant work should be provided.
3. A technical proposal must be provided that is not more than 4 pages. This technical proposal must provide an overview of the proposed solution as well as resumes of all key personnel performing the work. In addition, the technical proposal should provide a proposed schedule and milestones, as applicable.
4. A price proposal must be provided that is not more than 1 pages. This price proposal should indicate the overall fixed price for the project as well as hourly rates and an estimated total number of days.
5. Proposals must be signed by a representative that is authorized to commit bidder’s company.
6. Proposals must be received prior to the 10 March 2023 to be considered. Proposals should be submitted to stefano.savi@gpsnr.org and cheryl@gpsnr.org for consideration.
7. GPSNR reserves the right to amend the scope and budget of this RFP in order to get the most suitable consultant for each topic.

Project Timelines

Budget

The Platform is anticipating that a total budget of no more than €25,000 be allocated to this engagement.

Payment terms shall be:

·        20% at the signing of the contract

·        30% at the midpoint date to be agreed upon and memorialized in the contract based on the submitted work plan.

·        50% on delivery of the final report

The allocation of the payment shall be based on the net amount after travel expenses, if deemed necessary by both the consultant and Secretariat, are incurred and documented.

Evaluation Factors

 GPSNR will rate proposals based on the following factors, with cost being the most important factor:

1.        Responsiveness to the requirements set forth in this Request for Proposal

2.      Relevant past performance/ experience

3.      Samples of work

4.     Cost, including an assessment of total cost of ownership.

5.      Technical expertise/experience of bidder and bidder’s staff

GPSNR reserves the right to award to the bidder that presents the best value to GPSNR as determined solely by GPSNR in its absolute discretion.

Annex

Annex A: EU Deforestation Regulation

‘geolocation’ means the geographical location of a plot of land described by means of latitude and longitude coordinates corresponding to at least one latitude and longitude point and using at least six decimal digits. For relevant commodities other than cattle, for plots of land of more than 4 hectares, the geographical location shall be provided using polygons, meaning sufficient latitude and longitude points to describe the perimeter of each plot of land.

Text obtained from Article 2: Definitions, point (29) of the Deforestation Regulation consolidated text dated 20/12/22Deforestation Regulation consolidated text 20-12-22

View RFP Document here